A writing friend of mine recently mentioned the old idea that the difference between story and plot is character. Really, of course, it’s a matter of how the terms are defined – ask ten writers, you’ll probably get twelve definitions.
But the underlying point is valid. I recently saw a good example in Disney’s latest princess movie, Tangled.
Without giving too much away, there is a scene where the lead character is emotionally conflicted. She is happy about something she’s done, but unhappy about how she had to do it.
There is an entire scene devoted to her emotional conflict that does not advance the plot – that is, the sequence of events leading to the resolution of the story – at all. Just the opposite, actually – the presence of this extra scene slows the advancement of events.
But it is a great scene. It’s funny. And it tells us about our princess and helps us care about her. And it is by caring about her that we give a damn about the story. ‘Cause otherwise it is just a sequence of events.
So I guess the best plot is the world falls short if it doesn’t happen to someone. To look at it another way, perhaps a great sequence of events that don’t involve the audience with the characters should be called something other than a story. Like a history, or a saga, or something.
No comments:
Post a Comment